PimcorevsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pimcore | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 18 in Content Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 3 883 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +833 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 28 |
| Latest release | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.
Pimcore ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+833 stars in 30 days).
Pimcore details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Pimcore, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with