rsyslogvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rsyslog | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Logging | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 343 | 95 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +2 339 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 25 |
| Latest release | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for rsyslog.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).
rsyslog details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep rsyslog, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with