rsyslogvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rsyslog | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Logging | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
rsyslog scores 67/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
rsyslog ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
rsyslog is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
rsyslog details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep rsyslog, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with