rsspushvsWallabag
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rsspush | Wallabag | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in RSS | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 621 | 13 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +50 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | — | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Wallabag scores 73/100 against 42/100 for rsspush, so it is the safer default.
Wallabag ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for rsspush.
If you want the quickest setup, rsspush is easier to run; Wallabag needs more configuration.
Wallabag is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).
rsspush details →Wallabag details →
Swap a project
Keep rsspush, compare it with
Keep Wallabag, compare it with