Retromvsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Retrom | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Emulation | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 100 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.8.4 · 14 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Retrom scores 59/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
Retrom ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; Retrom needs more configuration.
Retrom is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).
Retrom details →static_status details →
Swap a project
Keep Retrom, compare it with
Keep static_status, compare it with