retroassemblyvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →Workout.cool details →