retroassemblyvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →Windows ARM details →