retroassemblyvsTeleport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Teleport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Teleport scores 76/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
Teleport ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
retroassembly details →Teleport details →