retroassemblyvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 13 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +299 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →Stash details →