retroassemblyvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
retroassembly scores 56/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
retroassembly is growing faster right now (+71 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →