retroassemblyvsspeech-to-phrase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | speech-to-phrase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +72 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 2 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
retroassembly scores 56/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.
retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →speech-to-phrase details →