retroassemblyvssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| retroassembly | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Emulation | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 153 | 45 672 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 22 |
| Latest release | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).
retroassembly details →sentry details →