AudioMuse-AIvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AudioMuse-AI | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 2 835 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +192 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
AudioMuse-AI scores 67/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
AudioMuse-AI ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; AudioMuse-AI needs more configuration.
AudioMuse-AI is growing faster right now (+192 stars in 30 days).
AudioMuse-AI details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep AudioMuse-AI, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with