Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUIvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audio Processing | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 928 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +415 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 29 |
| Latest release | 2.3.260718 · 21 Jul 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI scores 77/100 against 76/100 for verdaccio, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI needs more configuration.
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI is growing faster right now (+415 stars in 30 days).
Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep Retrieval-based-Voice-Conversion-WebUI, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with