AudioMuse-AIvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AudioMuse-AI | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 822 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +179 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 29 |
| Latest release | v3.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 67/100 for AudioMuse-AI, so it is the safer default.
AudioMuse-AI ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 29 for verdaccio.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; AudioMuse-AI needs more configuration.
AudioMuse-AI is growing faster right now (+179 stars in 30 days).
AudioMuse-AI details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep AudioMuse-AI, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with