Resume-MatchervsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Resume-Matcher | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 28 913 | 35 502 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +405 | +1 770 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).
Resume-Matcher details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with