ResonusvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Resonus | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 59 in Music Streaming | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 212 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.8.4 · 20 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 48/100 for Resonus, so it is the safer default.
Resonus ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, Resonus is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Resonus details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Resonus, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with