ResonusvsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Resonus | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 212 | 38 979 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 367 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.8.4 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 48/100 for Resonus, so it is the safer default.
Resonus ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.
If you want the quickest setup, Resonus is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 367 stars in 30 days).
Resonus details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep Resonus, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with