RemoteTerm for MeshCorevsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RemoteTerm for MeshCore | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in Amateur Radio | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 337 | 93 043 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 249 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 |
| Latest release | 3.17.1 · 26 Jul 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 45/100 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; RemoteTerm for MeshCore needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 249 stars in 30 days).
RemoteTerm for MeshCore details →uptime-kuma details →