RembgvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rembg | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Image Processing | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 25 219 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +80 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 13 |
| Latest release | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Rembg and SRS score the same (78/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Rembg.
If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.
Swap a project
Keep Rembg, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with