Rejourneyvstemps
Two self-hosted Sentry alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rejourney | temps | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 27 in Analytics | #9 of 14 in Platform as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 284 | 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +89 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | unity-v0.1.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
temps scores 58/100 against 46/100 for Rejourney, so it is the safer default.
Rejourney ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for temps.
If you want the quickest setup, temps is easier to run; Rejourney needs more configuration.
temps is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).
Rejourney details →temps details → All Sentry alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Rejourney, compare it with
Keep temps, compare it with