redroidvssupa-manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| redroid | supa-manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 5 in Emulation | #39 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 7 054 | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
redroid scores 57/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, redroid is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.
redroid is growing faster right now (+2 stars in 30 days).
redroid details →supa-manager details →
Swap a project
Keep redroid, compare it with
Keep supa-manager, compare it with