Redashvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 850 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Redash ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
Redash is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with