Metabasevszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Metabase | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 49 917 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +519 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+519 stars in 30 days).
Metabase details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Metabase, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with