Redashvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 28 850 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with