RedashvsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 28 851 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Wildbox ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
If you want the quickest setup, Redash is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Redash is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with