ReadMeABookvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 41 137 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 76 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with