Reactive ResumevsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 45 003 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 630 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 630 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with