EntevsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 29 713 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +668 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 9 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Dart | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 81/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Ente is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Ente is growing faster right now (+668 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with