Reactive Resumevswraft
Two self-hosted Document Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 44 995 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 622 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 3 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →wraft details →All Document Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with