Reactive Resumevswerbot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | werbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #36 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 44 998 | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 36/100 for werbot, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for werbot.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; werbot needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →werbot details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep werbot, compare it with