Reactive ResumevsWealthfolio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Wealthfolio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #5 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 45 007 | 9 281 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 634 | +245 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 21 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.11.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Wealthfolio, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for Wealthfolio.
If you want the quickest setup, Wealthfolio is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Wealthfolio details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Wealthfolio, compare it with