Reactive ResumevsWazuh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Wazuh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 45 002 | 17 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 629 | +493 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 80/100 for Wazuh, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Wazuh details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Wazuh, compare it with