Reactive ResumevsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 44 995 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 622 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 33 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Warpgate.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with