Reactive ResumevsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 45 030 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 629 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 18 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for Urocissa.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with