Reactive ResumevsTurtl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Turtl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 45 054 | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 653 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Turtl details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Turtl, compare it with