Reactive Resumevssubarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | subarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 030 | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 629 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.7.24 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for subarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →subarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep subarr, compare it with