Entevssubarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | subarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 717 | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +672 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 10 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.7.24 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Dart | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 81/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.
Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for subarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Ente is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.
Ente is growing faster right now (+672 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →subarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep subarr, compare it with