Reactive Resumevsstatusnook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 45 045 | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 644 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.
If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →statusnook details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep statusnook, compare it with