Reactive ResumevsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 45 012 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 611 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 611 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with