Reactive Resumevssandboxed.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | sandboxed.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 45 040 | 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 639 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for sandboxed.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →sandboxed.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep sandboxed.sh, compare it with