Reactive ResumevsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 45 002 | 35 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 629 | +1 771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 5 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with