Reactive Resumevsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 45 012 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 611 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 39 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 34 for Reactive Resume.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 611 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →rudderstack details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep rudderstack, compare it with