Reactive Resumevsrss-to-activitypub
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | rss-to-activitypub | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 45 073 | 582 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 672 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.0.9 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 44/100 for rss-to-activitypub, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for rss-to-activitypub.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; rss-to-activitypub needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 672 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →rss-to-activitypub details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep rss-to-activitypub, compare it with