BentoPDFvsrss-to-activitypub
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | rss-to-activitypub | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 | 582 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 44/100 for rss-to-activitypub, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for rss-to-activitypub.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; rss-to-activitypub needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+479 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →rss-to-activitypub details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep rss-to-activitypub, compare it with