Reactive Resumevsrebacklogs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | rebacklogs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 007 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 634 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for rebacklogs.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 634 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →rebacklogs details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep rebacklogs, compare it with