Ralllyvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rallly | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 331 | 93 048 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +1 254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 19 |
| Latest release | v4.16.3 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 70/100 for Rallly, so it is the safer default.
Rallly ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 254 stars in 30 days).
Rallly details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Rallly, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with