RalllyvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Rallly | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 5 331 | 35 795 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +62 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 29 | 28 |
| Latest release | v4.16.3 · 26 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 70/100 for Rallly, so it is the safer default.
Rallly ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Rallly is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
Rallly details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Rallly, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with