QinglongvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qinglong | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 34 in Task Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 20 024 | 35 795 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 28 |
| Latest release | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 69/100 for Qinglong, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
Qinglong details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Qinglong, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with