RadarrvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Radarr | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 45 in Download Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 14 671 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +240 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Radarr scores 78/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Radarr is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).
Radarr details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →